Learn / Glossary

Clause history

Further assurances

Legal information, not legal advice. How a phrase is read depends on the governing law and the rest of the agreement.

A further assurances clause requires each party to sign documents and take actions reasonably needed to give full effect to the agreement. A typical version reads: "Each party will execute and deliver such further documents and take such further actions as may be reasonably required to carry out the provisions of this Agreement."

The clause comes from conveyancing. When land or other property was transferred, the buyer could not always know at signing which further deeds, registrations or confirmations would be needed to perfect title. A covenant for further assurance obliged the seller to supply them later, and the idea spread into commercial agreements of every kind.

In modern deals it matters most where something has to happen after signing: assigning intellectual property, registering a transfer, filing a security interest, or obtaining a third party's consent. Without it, the other party may have no clear obligation to sign the extra document, even though the deal plainly depends on it.

The clause is not unlimited. Courts generally read it as supporting the bargain already made, not as a way to impose new obligations the parties did not agree. Drafting points to watch are who bears the cost of the further steps, whether the obligation is "reasonable" or absolute, and whether it survives termination.

A common example is an asset purchase in which some contracts cannot be assigned until a counterparty consents. The further assurances clause, read with a specific covenant to seek those consents, gives the buyer a basis to require the seller's help after closing, such as signing a notice to the counterparty or holding the contract on trust until consent arrives.

Some agreements pair the clause with a power of attorney, so that one party can sign the further documents if the other does not. That is a significant grant and should be limited to the documents the deal requires.

For a small legal team, the practical question is simple: what has to happen after signing, and who must do it? If the answer is anything more than payment, the clause is worth reading closely, together with any specific covenants about consents, filings or transfers that sit elsewhere in the agreement and may set firmer duties than the general clause.

When AI summarizes an agreement, it often treats further assurances as boilerplate and leaves it out. If the deal involves a transfer or a filing after closing, ask the model specifically whether the agreement obliges the other party to cooperate with it, and quote the clause.

Was this useful?